Re: Chaim, Creative USB Modem Blaster?, USA, Debian GNU/Linux 4.0, kernel 2.6.18-5-486

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



RE: if by chance your modem is USB CDC ACM compliant
If USB support is fully installed and the acm.ko  driver suffices, the
modem should be detected by:
# wvdialconf  /etc/wvdial.conf

MarvS

On 9/16/07, Jacques Goldberg <Jacques.Goldberg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chaim,
> It is impossible to identify an USB modem by its chipset, at least I do
> not know how to do that.
> Please, which are the make of your modem?
> Please give as much information as you can, including everything written
> on the modem.
> If the device would be a PCI chip embedded in the USB modem, then 148d
> means that the manufacturer is Digicom which has only one modem, 1003,
> in its catalog (a Conexant HCF clone or embedded). But this is not your
> case.
> There is no information for any device model 1671 made by Digicom.
> Rob Clark's well maintained table http://xmodem.org/modems/usblist.html
> shows two modems made by ASKEY using Digicom chips: none has the same
> USB chip 148d:1671 as yours.
> Have you read http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Modem-HOWTO-2.html ?
> And specially section 2.9 ?
> Have you tried to run wvdialconf  (see man wvdialconf or
> http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/wvdial.html) to see if by chance your
> modem is USB CDC ACM compliant and thus will work without any extra driver?
> Are you aware that the modem has to be powered when trying wvdialconf?
>
> Jacques
>
> C M Ackerman wrote:
> > The usb modem reports:
> > ID 148d:1671
> >
> > Is there support for this?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Chaim
>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Development]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Fedora Women]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux