Re: Fw: Re2: Antonio, Italy, Ubuntu 6.06 / 6.10, kernel 2.6.15 / 2.6.17, HSF Conexant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Antonio.

slamr is completely incompatible/ineffective with Conexant hardware.
Jonathan will have to comment on the hsfmodem issues.

MarvS

On 3/13/07, Linuxant support (Jonathan) <support@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

we are aware that this specific issue is affecting some users. There is
no time estimate when this problem will be fixed but we hope that it
will be soon. It is important to note that the problem is most likely in
the ALSA code.

As far as we know, this is an intermittent problem, sometimes it will
work (very rarely on some systems), sometimes not. The exact reason is
not known except that it is related to the HDA bus probing.

Regards,


Jonathan
Technical specialist / Linuxant
www.linuxant.com
support@xxxxxxxxxxxx



arinaldi@xxxxxxx wrote:
> All,
>
> here are results and status of latest tests for this thread.
>
>
> - Installation of ALSA 1.0.14rc1 went smoothly. The system configuration
> reports
>
>     Sound Driver:3.8.1a-980706 (ALSA v1.0.14rc1 emulation code)
>
> and sound system is functioning.
>
> - I installed then the latest version of linuxant driver,
> hsfmodem_7.60.00.02full_k2.6.17_10_generic_ubuntu_i386.deb .
>
> Unfortunately the results are the same as previously; I tried also loading
> ungrab-winmodem before driver installation, reboot, and several repetitions
> of "hsfstop; hsfconfig -i", nothing different.
>
>
> Jonathan,
>
> I have two questions:
>
> - do you have any idea on the possible next driver release addressing this
> bug?
>
> - as I described, it was only once but the modem was recognized by
> hsfconfig -i; I would like to understand why. It seems to me that such fact
> would indicate the issue is more related to module loading sequence, and
> thus should have a relatively simple solution.
>
>
> Marv,
>
> when I run scanModem after the ALSA upgrade, I found that it still reports
> the original distribution driver, i.e. "ALSAversion 1.0.11".
>
> I thought also to try anyway the slmodem approach, by downloading and
> installing slamr-2.6.17-10-generic.tar.gz . Following the terminal output:
>
> ============================
>
> $ sudo ./setup
> When asked about your country, Enter:
>         USA
>
> Installing the Debian packages supporting autoloading
> Selecting previously deselected package sl-modem-daemon.
> (Reading database ... 81151 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking sl-modem-daemon (from sl-modem-daemon_2.9.10+2.9.9
> d+e-pre2-5build1_i386.deb) ...
> Setting up sl-modem-daemon (2.9.10+2.9.9d+e-pre2-5build1) ...
> FATAL: Module slamr not found.
> Starting SmartLink Modem driver for: auto.
> Creating /dev/modem symlink, pointing to: /dev/ttySL0.
>
> Copying over newer files
> cp: cannot stat `sl-modem-daemon.modutils': No such file or directory
> Making folder /lib/modules/2.6.17-10-generic/extra
> Copying drivers to /lib/modules/2.6.17-10-generic/extra
> Checking driver install
> slamr.ko  slusb.ko  ungrab-winmodem.ko
> Finished installs.
> Informing the System
>
> Starting function tests, loading drivers:
> Running diagnostic:
>
> [17186809.896000] slamr: SmartLink AMRMO modem.
>
> ports should be created by:
> slmodemd -c USA /dev/slamr0
> error: mdm setup: cannot open dev `/dev/slamr0': No such device
> error: cannot setup device `/dev/slamr0'
> Checking for success
> Port creation with slmodemd failed.
> Read the Slamr.txt record, other 1st_Read.txt CountryList.txt wvdial.txt
> files and the sample wvdial.conf.
>
> ============================
>
> I have noted three issues, I don't know if they are real or simply an
> effect of the driver being incorrect for the modem (I apologize if that
> should be the case).
>
> - for my case scanModem doesn't provide the device specification N to use
> for slmodemd --alsa hw:0,N
>
> - there is the message "FATAL: Module slamr not found." but the module is
> there, as output a few lines after; in fact when loading slamr before $
> sudo ./setup I get the same output as before except that there are two
> instances of the module, the second one being
> [17187467.824000] slamr: SmartLink AMRMO modem.
>
> - the last indication is "Read the Slamr.txt record", but I was not able to
> find the file.
>
>
> Thanks to all for the follow up so far.
> Regards
> Antonio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                       "Linuxant
>                       support                  To:      Marvin Stodolsky <marvin.stodolsky@xxxxxxxxx>
>                       (Jonathan)"              cc:      "arinaldi@xxxxxxx" <arinaldi@xxxxxxx>, discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>                       <support@linuxan         Subject: Re: Fw: Re2: Antonio, Italy, Ubuntu 6.06 / 6.10, kernel 2.6.15 / 2.6.17, HSF
>                       t.com>                   Conexant
>
>                       09/03/2007 19:40
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> the version of ALSA currently being used by the driver can be determined
> with the changelog available at:
>
> http://www.linuxant.com/drivers/hsf/changes.php
>
> If the version of ALSA used by the driver really becomes a problem, we
> could display it in the output of the 'hsfconfig --info' command for
> example. However, fixing the actual problem(s) is a better solution.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jonathan
> Technical specialist / Linuxant
> www.linuxant.com
> support@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Marvin Stodolsky wrote:
>> Jonathan,
>>   Thanks. It would be usefull if the ALSA version used in the
>> hsfmodem packages was posted somewhere and also output by hsfmodem
>> during its installation.
>>
>> Antonio,
>>  You can follow the same update instructions
>> http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/archive-seventh/msg00282.html
>> Just use the version  1.0.14rc1 lib and driver package rather than the
>> 1.0.13
>> I initially suggested.
>>
>> MarvS
>>
>> On 3/8/07, Linuxant support (Jonathan) <support@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the current version of the HSF driver, 7.60.00.02 is based on ALSA
>>> 1.0.14rc1. Even if the user changes the version of ALSA used by the
>>> kernel, since the HSF driver will replace the HDA related modules
>>> (snd-hda-intel and snd-hda-codec), it will have no effect.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>> Technical specialist / Linuxant
>>> www.linuxant.com
>>> support@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marvin Stodolsky wrote:
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>> There are instructions for upgrading snd-hda-intel and its
>>>> dependent driver set at
>>>> http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/archive-seventh/msg00282.html
>>>> You can try upgrading to the version 1.0.13
>>>> Perhaps this will bring a fix to the problem.
>>>>
>>>> MarvS
>>>>
>>>> On 3/7/07, Linuxant support (Jonathan) <support@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> we can see a lot of these error messages in your 'dmesg':
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> [17179987.384000] hda_codec: invalid dep_range_val 0:7fff
>>>>> [17179987.800000] cnxthsf_OsEventWaitTime(d9ef38e0/HDA
>>>>> CodecUnsolicitedmessage, 40): returning OSEVENT_WAIT_TIMEOUT
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a known issue on some systems with HDA modems. As far as we
>>>>> know, this is a HDA probing issue in the ALSA code shipped with the
>>>>> driver and we hope that it will be fixed in a future release of the
>>>>> driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> As you have mentioned, doing multiple times this command:
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> sudo hsfstop; sudo hsfconfig -i
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> can be used as a workaround but it doesn't work on all systems
>>>>> unfortunately.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since you have a HDA sound device and since the HSF driver did
> replace
>>>>> the complete HDA driver, it is normal that sound is no longer
> working.
>>>>> For the time being, if you want to recover your sound, please
>>> uninstall
>>>>> the driver with the 'sudo hsfconfig --uninstall' command and reboot
>>> your
>>>>> system.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>> Technical specialist / Linuxant
>>>>> www.linuxant.com
>>>>> support@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Marvin Stodolsky wrote:
>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is an:
>>>>>>>  PCI slot   PCI ID            SubsystemID Name
>>>>>>>  ---------- ---------   ---------   --------------
>>>>>>>  00:14.2    1002:437b   1025:009f   Audio device: ATI
>>> Technologies Inc
>>>>>>>  /proc/asound/SB/codec#1:Vendor Id: 0x14f12bfa
>>>>>>> /proc/asound/card0/codec#1:Vendor Id: 0x14f12bfa
>>>>>> System which is not being recogized by your hsfmodem package.
>>>>>> Details below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MarvS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/5/07, arinaldi@xxxxxxx <arinaldi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> following the details according to the instructions of Jacques.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - accurate removal of previous driver installation;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - downloaded latest scanModem;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - run it and appending below ModemData.txt;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - installed
>>> hsfmodem_7.60.00.01full_k2.6.17_10_generic_ubuntu_i386.deb
>>>>>>> installation OK with the quite normal message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Warning: no device detected by hsf driver - HDA modems may require
>>>>> reboot
>>>>>>> Note: kernel module snd-via82xx-modem overridden by hsfmc97via
>>>>>>> Note: kernel module snd-intel8x0m overridden by hsfmc97ich
>>> hsfmc97sis
>>>>>>> Note: kernel module snd-atiixp-modem overridden by hsfmc97ati
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and sound system stopped functioning;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - full system reboot but nothing changed;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - tried as instructed by Linuxant:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> disabling the sound system,
>>>>>>> sudo hsfstop
>>>>>>> sudo hsfconfig -i
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the system spends more time in executing the second instruction
>>> but no
>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>> to have modem recognized (repeated also after reboot).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Removing the driver the sound system is working again (after
>>>>> reboot).
>>>>>>> - For completness I am appending below part of hsfdiag.txt.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - This modem appears however to be a conexant, as windows drivers
>>>>>>> state so
>>>>>>> (I added that output to my first mail, but I have seen now that
>>> it was
>>>>>>> truncated on pasting by my mail client); I can resend it if
>>> required.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Marvin,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sorry for the inconvenience of the html format, I was sending
> those
>>>>> two
>>>>>>> mails from a different location and was not aware of the setting.
>>>>> Hope it
>>>>>>> is OK now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your attention. Regards
>>>>>>> Antonio
>
>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Development]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Fedora Women]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux