Re: Interdependent, failing commits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08.01.25 10:54, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
So I'm now at a chain of four reverts
* <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/179940/> "Revert 'fix ubsan failure'" * <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/179925/> "Revert 'convert RES_OBJECTDYING to SfxHint'" * <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/179941/> "Revert 'convert RES_ATTRSET_CHG to SfxHint'" * <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/179946/> "Revert 'Revert 'Revert 'stronger typing for SwClient::GetRegisteredIn'' and fix SwIterator cast'" that will together hopefully turn <https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/ lo_ubsan/> green again.  (I know such a mass revert orgy is not exactly ideal, but it appears to me the only viable way forward at the moment.)

Björn, Noel, I would be grateful if you could refrain from pushing further commits in those areas until the above Gerrit chain has been pushed and a fresh build of <https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/lo_ubsan/> (which I'll trigger once the chain has been pushed) is seen green (hopefully).  Thanks

and <https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/lo_ubsan/3427/> is indeed green again




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux