Il 22/12/24 11:26, Mattia Verga ha scritto: > Il 19/12/24 09:19, Miklos Vajna - vmiklos at collabora.com ha scritto: >> Hi Mattia, >> >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 06:59:33AM +0000, Mattia Verga >> <libreoffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I got the same failure with the patch applied... I'll set up a virtual >>> machine to build LO in different combinations LO/xmlsec and see where >>> the test passes or fails. >> I added that test suite (with a single test) relatively recently and I >> only tested it with internal xmlsec. It may be fine to disable that test >> in the system xmlsec case; the original use-case is via libreofficekit, >> and that in practice always uses internal xmlsec. >> >> Let me know if you find that this is some system-xmlsec-1.2.x vs >> internal-xmlsec-1.3.x problem, if so, it should be a matter of: >> >> ifeq ($(SYSTEM_XMLSEC),) >> ... >> endif >> >> around CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_xmlsec in >> xmlsecurity/Module_xmlsecurity.mk till we can assume that all distros >> updated to xmlsec-1.3.x. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Miklos >> > I tried to build 25.2.0.0.beta1 first with system's xmlsec1 1.2.41, > then with bundled 1.3.0 and 1.3.6. That test always fails, so there's > something else in Fedora that doesn't like it. > > I'm not sure how to debug further, for what I understand the gdb > backtrace doesn't show anything useful. > > Mattia > FWIW, I've uploaded the backtrace here: https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/backtrace.log