On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:32:49 +0200 Xisco Fauli <xiscofauli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Dan, > > That test is indeed testing the patch you are reverting, so it's > expected to fail. It shouldn't fail if you also revert > 2ac7d339a97efa638124c2862551e0876487833b. thanks, it makes sense (and helps) :-) Dan > On 6/9/23 15:41, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 18:53:37 +0200 > > Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> seems the recent change [1] to KahanSum handling causes a test failure > >> on ppc64le. > >> > >> [1] https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/1f8cc7644293e62ad6430bbeec243d3283e478d7 > > and with the change reverted I am getting a failure in > > CppunitTest_sc_ucalc_formula2 > > > > ... > > testTdf147398::TestBody finished in: 11ms > > [_RUN_____] testTdf156985::TestBody > > /home/sharkcz/projects/libreoffice/sc/qa/unit/ucalc_formula2.cxx: > > 4624:testTdf156985::TestBody equality assertion failed > > - Expected: 0 > > - Actual : -1.59872115546023e-14 > > > > testTdf156985::TestBody finished in: 11ms > > ... > > > > so not good ... > > > > > > Dan > > -- > Xisco Faulí > LibreOffice QA Team > IRC: x1sc0 >