Re: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Am 10.01.23 um 17:31 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I know are built for Fedora releases; they go into category 2.
Also in Debian
Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I presume are built for Debian releases (Rene, correct me if I'm wrong); they go into category 3.

Indeed.

And then there are 3 implementations that are presumably in active use elsewhere (Tor, wjh-la, Sakura286, correct me if I'm wrong); which go into category 4.

Or "active" development (for some values of active)

That leaves 11 implementations that are presumably dead, in category 5.

So if you know about any active use of any of those 11 implementations in category 5 below, please report back here. Otherwise, the plan (to be discussed in the ESC) is to eventually remove them in due course.

I believe people at Debian will scream here but I personally don't mind if those in category 5 are gone for good.

Regards,

Rene




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux