On 18/12/2020 11:59, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
* A macOS ARM64 JDK is work in progress (<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/391> "JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port"), and e.g. a MacPorts build of openjdk15 would still only cross-build an x86-64 one. But Azul appears to be progressing that JEP (<https://adtmag.com/articles/2020/11/12/azul-supports-apple-silicon.aspx>), and already offers e.g. JDK13 (<https://cdn.azul.com/zulu/bin/zulu13.35.1017-ca-jdk13.0.5.1-macos_aarch64.tar.gz>) and a JDK16EA (<https://cdn.azul.com/zulu/bin/zulu16.0.73-ea-jdk16.0.0-ea.28-macos_aarch64.zip>; curiously, there's no JDK15, though):
For the record: <https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/391> "JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port" has meanwhile been implemented in OpenJDK 17, which lead to our <https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/e529461bcb126e0975ffa3f86e1fd5a630551de2%5E!/> "Enable JVM also on macOS ARM64" and follow-up <https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/81debfba86b1d67d1c2e0ecd9c10ca35c3e7de5e%5E!/> "Restrict macOS ARM64 to Java >= 17". (Though our cofigure.ac would still accept any JDK >= 9 for the build as on other platforms, even if that could cause failures later. That check could be adapted if anybody sees a need.)
