On 5/11/22 21:07, Maarten Hoes wrote:
I also added '--with-parallelism=1' to ./autogen.sh, to make the output of 'make' a little clearer and easier to read.
...or, for a parallelizing make invocation, pass -O (aka --output-sync=target)
Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- From: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 08:46:49 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAHvU03WnBG_CmyybDto+b=KwCXX3iF27F6OY7dOZ2asOCKGJmQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAHvU03XUJsS96m0bgcjYradQ4+=pMEV5quheqaWk5kvtW4sCDg@mail.gmail.com> <202205111928.33775.l.lunak@collabora.com> <CAHvU03WnBG_CmyybDto+b=KwCXX3iF27F6OY7dOZ2asOCKGJmQ@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- From: Maarten Hoes
- Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- References:
- Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- From: Maarten Hoes
- Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- From: Luboš Luňák
- Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- From: Maarten Hoes
- Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- Prev by Date: Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- Next by Date: Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- Previous by thread: Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- Next by thread: Re: Compiling LO for lcov/gcov code coverage fails (gb_GCOV=YES)
- Index(es):
 |