Re: libreoffice-7.3.2 compile in arm system

[Luboš Luňák <l.lunak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 22 of March 2022, Kevin Suo wrote:
> Is the dev package needed at build time or when he installs the compiled
> rpm packages? I think he gets the error when installing the rpms.

 If yes, that would be a CentOS problem. Only libXinerama.so is meant to be in 
the development package, libXinerama.so.1 should be part of the normal 
package. Or, possibly, it's a user error that would be easily handled by 
using a package management tool that handles dependencies automatically.

 One way or another this does not look like a problem with the LO packages.

> 于 2022年3月22日 GMT+08:00 下午1:35:14, Stephen Chivers <snchivers@xxxxxxxxxxx> 写
到:
> >SInce it is a CentOS System, "Development" package for libxinerama has
> >to be installed, that is:
> >
> >libXinerama-devel-1.1.3-2.1.el7.aarch64
> >
> >On 22/3/22 16:31, Michael Weghorn wrote:
> >> On 22/03/2022 05.57, gcxyw1314 wrote:
> >>> The packages I compiled on the centos7.7 arm system are as follows:
> >>> When I install it, it says it is missing libXinerama.so.1
> >>> But I have installed
> >>> libXinerama-1.1.3-2.1.el7.aarch64
> >>>
> >>> -> Finished Dependency Resolution
> >>> Error: Package: lodevbasis7.0-core-7.0.6.2-2.aarch64 (/lodevbasis7.0-co
> >>>re-7.0.6.2-2.aarch64)
> >>>
> >>>             Requires: libXinerama.so.1
> >>>   You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> >>> https://paste.debian.net/1235204/
> >>
> >> Did you install the package "libXinerama"?
> >>
> >> https://centos.pkgs.org/7/centos-aarch64/libXinerama-1.1.3-2.1.el7.aarch
> >>64.rpm.html



-- 
 Luboš Luňák
 l.lunak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx