Re: ESC meeting agenda: 2022-02-10 16:00 Berlin time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09.02.2022 18:45, Miklos Vajna wrote:
Extra items are appreciated either in this document or as a reply to this mail:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147248 - in connection with WebP support (https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114532)

The problem raised in the tdf#114532 was that the implemented unconditional conversion of WebP into PNG was unwanted by some who wanted to use WebP in their documents (taking full advantage from the newly supported format), or who wanted to have the original along with the fallback for later time when the fallback could be dropped.

That brought some concerns, because introducing fallback along with original could later result in sudden "breakage" of existing images in the document after an upgrade that decides to drop the fallback (see comment 27). Later it was suggested that we could drop existing fallback from SVG already today, at which stage I filed the tdf#147248.

So there are some decisions that ESC could advise for *general* handling of fallback saved along with original media - just because adding such things is much easier than dropping it later. E.g., is it really possible to drop SVG fallback now? What should be pre-requisite for such drop, breaking backward compatibility of documents? What should be pre-requisite to *add* fallback to a format? Is it OK to drop original when there's no data loss (there's an obvious data loss when converting vector SVG to PNG, but possibly it's not that clear with bitmap WebP to PNG).

--
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux