Hi Stephan, On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 02:35:00PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Does <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=Development/clang-cl&oldid=423037> > "Update for current master and Clang binaries" cover your needs there? Yes, indeed. Thanks, Miklos
Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- From: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 08:46:21 +0100
- Cc: libreoffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4e21e452-fced-4971-f9b0-e98fb1dd192d@redhat.com>
- References: <CADjnUVXyr-7a5q7tcoQxpKSQQi19yA3iSqmsFEyayFgCkk5rpA@mail.gmail.com> <3c673e6c-8d6a-bd5a-d897-666534547f1d@collabora.com> <202111231711.59115.l.lunak@collabora.com> <fb704bb1-e6c0-6078-3045-f44f800709d0@redhat.com> <YaCabs/nngVdj4gx@collabora.com> <4e21e452-fced-4971-f9b0-e98fb1dd192d@redhat.com>
- References:
- clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- From: Arnaud Versini
- Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- From: Michael Meeks
- Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- From: Luboš Luňák
- Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- From: Stephan Bergmann
- Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- From: Miklos Vajna
- Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- From: Stephan Bergmann
- clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- Prev by Date: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for LibreOffice
- Next by Date: ESC meeting minutes: 2021-12-09
- Previous by thread: Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- Next by thread: Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- Index(es):
 |