On Monday 22 of November 2021, Arnaud Versini wrote: > I hope this could be an idea of improvement ! Next crazy test I would like > to do is between MSVC and clang on windows ! But it seems harder ! In case you still struggle with this, I made some fixes a couple of days back and updated https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/clang-cl, so hopefully building current master with Clang-cl should be now simple enough. -- Luboš Luňák l.lunak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- From: Luboš Luňák <l.lunak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:01:27 +0100
- Cc: Arnaud Versini <arnaud.versini@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CADjnUVXyr-7a5q7tcoQxpKSQQi19yA3iSqmsFEyayFgCkk5rpA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CADjnUVXyr-7a5q7tcoQxpKSQQi19yA3iSqmsFEyayFgCkk5rpA@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: KMail/1.9.10
- References:
- clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- From: Arnaud Versini
- clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- Prev by Date: PSA: 'make build-nocheck' is no more, use plain 'make' instead
- Next by Date: Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- Previous by thread: Re: clang vs gcc build performance (executable not build time)
- Next by thread: About tdf#145831 "Typo in Portable Network Graphics string" and avoid breaking potential public interface or existing LO profile
- Index(es):
 |