On 02.10.2021 11:31, Mike Kaganski wrote:
On 02.10.2021 11:14, scan-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
** CID 1485150: Error handling issues (UNCAUGHT_EXCEPT)
/usr/include/c++/9/optional: 254 in
std::_Optional_payload_base<SwContentNotify>::_M_destroy()()
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*** CID 1485150: Error handling issues (UNCAUGHT_EXCEPT)
/usr/include/c++/9/optional: 254 in
std::_Optional_payload_base<SwContentNotify>::_M_destroy()()
248 ::new ((void *) std::__addressof(this->_M_payload))
249 _Stored_type(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...);
250 this->_M_engaged = true;
251 }
252
253 constexpr void
CID 1485150: Error handling issues (UNCAUGHT_EXCEPT)
An exception of type "com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException"
is thrown but the throw list "noexcept" doesn't allow it to be
thrown. This will cause a call to unexpected() which usually calls
terminate().
254 _M_destroy() noexcept
255 {
256 _M_engaged = false;
257 _M_payload._M_value.~_Stored_type();
258 }
259
Interesting, why some implementation declares optional's dtor noexcept?
[optional.dtor] doesn't mention any 'noexcept' specification... at least
in n4835.pdf.
Ah, yes, implicitly noexcept dtors in c++11...
--
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
