On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 21:04 +0100, Luboš Luňák wrote: > Therefore, I propose that the decision to rename the master branch > is postponed for as long as the git project does not take a > definitive stance on it. That stance may take the form of e.g. the > git project making a statement on it or changing their default and > using it. Our decision can be then based on this input and may e.g. > take the form of simply taking the technical decision to do what git > does. +1 I support this approach too. Kohei _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice