Thorsten Behrens-6 wrote > ... > The reason is, that language evolves, and bad habits (or metaphors) of > the past shouldn't be persisted, if we know they are offensive to > others. Slavery itself shouldn't persist (badfully in some regions it still exists) but let's not confound the slavery itself with some words used in different contexts. About "master", the expressions "MC"/"Master of Ceremony" in music, "Master's_degree", "masterplan", "to master something", .... are bad habits too and should be renamed/rephrased? Should we also remove (burn?) lots of books and republish them after having processed global autocorrection? (I would even replace "autocorrection" by "censorship" here) If you'd ask every people on earch what they may consider offensive, you could remove lots of words. Do you also consider we should rename "abort" (because people against abortion could consider this term offensive) or "command" (because may be related to slavery too) (as already quoted in my previous comment)? Julien -- Sent from: http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Dev-f1639786.html _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice