* Lubo?? Lu???k (l.lunak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Saturday 23 of January 2021, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > Hi, > > What are peoples feelings for cppcheck's suggestions for stl algorithms? > > In https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/109846 I did a 'any_of' > > and a 'accumulate' that it suggested; the any_of does look better, > > the accumulate seems marginally better. > > To me they both seem as a regression. I find the original code easily > readable, I just look and see, while I need to "decypher" the std algo code. That's fair enough; I think that's especially true of the 'accumulate' one where you still actually have to do the addition and pass a total around. It's a real shame that the algorithm code needs the x.begin(), x.end() that makes it more verbose than I'd have expected. > > Does the project/people have general preferences on whether it's > > worth tackling these suggestions? > > > > I was less sure what to do with the suggestions for 'transform'; > > some of them were replacing very simple loops; another > > was using emplace_back to add the results to the destination and I wasn't > > sure what I'd pass into transform for the equivalent. > > Suggestions from an automated tool are just that, suggestions. IMO common > sense should be a higher priority than blindly following an automated tool. Sure, that's why I asked before plunging in and doing a zillion of them. Dave > -- > Lubo?? Lu??ák > l.lunak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice