Re: unowinreg.dll and Win64

[Rene Engelhard <rene@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi again,

Am 28.11.20 um 17:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> So if Windows builds it per default (without any extra flags afaics)
> that would mean the 64bit windows builds builds a 64bit .dll and thus we
> need to adapt this, too for Linux 64bit packages?
>
> As probably Java will refuse to load the 32bit library on 64bit systems?
>
> Which then would mean we'd put it into a package which is
> architecture-specific and differs between i386 and amd64 (which isn't
> the case on Linux yet as even on amd64 - as shown above - it gets the
> 32bit one.)

And if that is true: What should a ppc64el or s390x or arm64 package
contain? The 64bit or 32bit one?

What should a armhf package contain? The 64bit or 32bit one?


Both would be a impossible since there could only be one unowinreg.dll
in <lodir>/sdk/classes/win/unowinreg.dll


Regards,


Rene

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice