Hi Stephan, On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:08:43AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And another point that just occurred to me is that we will probably run into > problems at some point in the future: It is likely that future C++ > standards will introduce constructs that cannot be parsed by clang-format > 5.0.0, and that LO will use such constructs in files that are processed by > clang-format. I'm happy to investigate an upgrade if there is a practical need for it. I'm not sure we have any of that today; perhaps structured bindings? But limiting the number of upgrades (to avoid reformat noise) probably has some value. Regards, Miklos
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
