Re: We'd like to continue the production of the 32-bit deb packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/08/2019 20:43, dreamnext@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
What we did if after a ‘make’ with errors, we had to ran ‘make build-nocheck’ to be able to bypass those errors on a Debian 10 schroot environment. This time, the required debs files were produced. However, when installing those debs and trying to run LibreOffice on Escuelas Linux (the main target distribution) it does not work, as it complains about a glibc mismatch version. So, it seems that the generated deb files are not distribution-independent as the ones that were previously released by The Document Foundation.

Note that producing builds that are compatible with our baseline (as spelled out in README.md) is a non-trivial endeavour. You typically do such builds on a baseline machine to make sure you do not link against functionality in e.g. libc.so.6 that is only available in newer versions of that library. However, a baseline machine typically has a C++ compiler that is too old for our needs, so you need a newer compiler but which generates code that only links against functionality that is already available in the baseline libstdc++.so.6 (e.g., by using Red Hat Developer Toolset).
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux