tdf124710, unexpected result for function IFS when argument NA() is followed by an argument that needs interpreting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Eike,

 

Upon debugging IFS( 0, NA(), 1+0, "output" ) I came to the following preliminary conclusions:

Before ScInterpreter::ScIfs_MS() is called, ScInterpreter::Interpret is called for argument '1+0' .

That leads to a call to scInterpreter::CalculateAddSub( false ) and there the problem starts.

0 and 1 are popped and added, but after PushDouble( ::rtl::math::approxAdd( 0, 1 ) )

the raw stacktype is svError.

Unfortunately most of the time I have only a machine with 4GB available for debugging, giving 5 minutes max before freezing, so the simple question what the raw stacktype is before PushDouble (when NA() is on top of the stack) will take me up to an hour -which I don't have right now.

 

Do you happen to know if in the case of a token on top of the stack of type svError (like NA()), this stacktype is remained when pushing new values/tokens to the stack?

If that is the case, I wouldn't know a proper way to fix this, unless there are no use cases where this behaviour is desired.

Any thoughts?

 

Winfried

 

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux