Hi! On 21.12.2018 20:37, Takeshi Abe wrote: > In order to tell whether the behavior reported in tdf#119102 [1] is a bug > or not, I would like to understand the specification of LibO Basic's Open > statement [2]. > > The following table summarizes what current (master) LibO does, which I read > from SbiStream::Open() in basic/source/runtime/iosys.cxx. > > ACCESS\FOR | APPEND | BINARY | INPUT | OUTPUT | RANDOM | > ----------------------+--------+--------+-------+--------+--------+ > default | - | - | - | X | - | > READ ("read only") | - | - | - | - | - | > WRITE ("write only") | - | -(*) | X | X | -(**) | > READ WRITE ("both") | - | -(*) | X | X | -(**) | > > "X": the runtime deletes the file of given path first if already exists; > "-": it does not. > (*) requested in i#18638 <https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=18638>; > see commit 23b49669ab70cac72d5f6d955e7d2af617e6934e. > (**) requested in i#61277 <https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=61277>; > see commit 42a63dd0e81f13a84a5f551e03ede685e2bf34c7. > > So here is a couple of questions popping up on a confused soul: > > (1) What does the default ACCESS mode mean? > Is it just the same as READ, WRITE, or READ WRITE? > Or does it depends on given FOR mode? > > (2) Does 'FOR INPUT + ACCESS WRITE' or 'FOR OUTPUT + ACCESS READ' make > any sense? Cannot answer the questions; just for completeness, something you could already know: the current handling of BINARY opened for write was defined in commit 23b49669ab70cac72d5f6d955e7d2af617e6934e [1] for #i18638 [2]. [1] https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/23b49669ab70cac72d5f6d955e7d2af617e6934e%5E%21/ [2] https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=18638 -- Best regards, Mike Kaganski _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice