Re: Upstream clang compiler plugins, licensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/10/2018 19:36, Tamás Zolnai wrote:
As I see LO's license is not compatible with LLVM license [1], as LLVM license is a more permissive license which allows to make the code part of a proprietary software for example. So I just wonder what is the best way to integrate things to clang from LO, either as a compiler plugin or a static analyzer check.
[...]
[1] https://opensource.org/licenses/NCSA

note that llvm itself is in the process of updating its license, <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126991.html> "[llvm-dev] LLVM Relicensing Update"
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux