On 21/09/2018 16:00, Terrence Enger wrote:
On my machine, the test ran successfully. I do not know how to dig
deeper.
Meanwhile, I shall try again. Maybe the problem will go away. (I
hate it when a problem just goes away. Almost, I hope that the
problem persists. Almost. Sigh! The test *did* run successfully for
the previous patch set.)
<https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_linux_clang_dbgutil/15160/> is
JunitTest_starmath_unoapi failing due to
Creating: sm.SmEditAccessible
LOG> Log started 15.08.2018 - 20:30:40
warn:vcl.opengl:15069:16426:vcl/opengl/x11/X11DeviceInfo.cxx:356: unknown vendor => blocked
warn:vcl.gdi:15069:15069:vcl/headless/svpgdi.cxx:256: non default depth bitmap, slow convert, upscale the input
LOG> ImplementationName SmEditAccessible
Environment created
LOG> Log started 15.08.2018 - 20:30:42
checking: [sm.SmEditAccessible::com::sun::star::accessibility::XAccessibleComponent] is iface: [com.sun.star.accessibility.XAccessibleComponent] testcode: [ifc.accessibility._XAccessibleComponent]
LOG> Execute: containsPoint()
LOG> Upper bound of box containsPoint point (0,0) - OK
LOG> Lower bound of box containsPoint point (0,138) - OK
LOG> Left bound of box containsPoint point (0,0) - OK
LOG> Right bound of box containsPoint point (476,0) - OK
LOG> Outer upper and lower bounds contain no component points - OK
LOG> Outer left and right bounds contain no component points - OK
Method containsPoint() finished with state OK
LOG> containsPoint(): COMPLETED.OK
LOG> Execute: getAccessibleAtPoint()
LOG> Checking child with bounds (0,0),(2,18): 41,(Paragraph: 0 ):
LOG> StateType containsPoint SHOWING: true
LOG> finding the point which lies on the component
LOG> Child found at point (1,9) - OK
LOG> The children found is not the same
LOG> Expected:
LOG> Description: Paragraph: 0 sum hat a
LOG> Found:
LOG> Description: Paragraph: 0 sum hat a
LOG> ... FAILED
LOG> No children found at point (-1,-1) - OK
Method getAccessibleAtPoint() finished with state FAILED
LOG> getAccessibleAtPoint(): COMPLETED.FAILED
Some of the tests are known to be fragile and unfortunately failing
occasionally, for one reason or another. This sm.SmEditAccessible test
is in that infamous set (and nobody knows why it occasionally fails, I
think; maybe some timing issue).
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
