On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 3:37 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am using ipset + iptables to classify and not filters. Besides, if > > tc is allowing me to define qdisc -> classes -> qdsic -> classes > > (1,2,3 ...) sort of structure (ie like the one shown in ascii tree) > > then how can those lowest child classes be actually used or consumed? > > Just install tc filters on the lower level too. If I understand correctly, you are saying, instead of : tc filter add dev eno2 parent 100: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000001 fw flowid 1:10 tc filter add dev eno2 parent 100: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000002 fw flowid 1:20 tc filter add dev eno2 parent 100: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000003 fw flowid 2:10 tc filter add dev eno2 parent 100: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000004 fw flowid 2:20 I should do this: (i.e. changing parent to just immediate qdisc) tc filter add dev eno2 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000001 fw flowid 1:10 tc filter add dev eno2 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000002 fw flowid 1:20 tc filter add dev eno2 parent 2: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000003 fw flowid 2:10 tc filter add dev eno2 parent 2: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000004 fw flowid 2:20 I tried this previously. But there is not change in the result. Behaviour is exactly same, i.e. I am still getting 100Mbps and not 100kbps or 300kbps Besides, as I mentioned previously I am using ipset + skbprio and not filters stuff. Filters I used just to test. ipset -N foo hash:ip,mark skbinfo ipset -A foo 10.10.10.10, 0x0x00000001 skbprio 1:10 ipset -A foo 10.10.10.20, 0x0x00000002 skbprio 1:20 ipset -A foo 10.10.10.30, 0x0x00000003 skbprio 2:10 ipset -A foo 10.10.10.40, 0x0x00000004 skbprio 2:20 iptables -A POSTROUTING -j SET --map-set foo dst,dst --map-prio That's why I added @Anton Danilov in cc, so that he can have a look as he designed this skbprio thing in ipset and thus would be having a better idea.
