It obvious that fixing bufferbloat problems has made great steps toward, the throughput overhead of fq_codel is a at low levels and can be negligible compared to the its advantages , I can submit some chart to this topic as soon as i get some free time... Regards On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Ronald Pina <pinaronald@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I have been tested DRR using fq_codel and codel in an extremely >> congested network and I can confirm that the average packet latency >> has been improved quite well comparing to fifo, the latency is keep at >> low levels and the throughput tends to be stable. > Isn't it awesome? We can replace the phone system now... > > I try to encourage people to use netperf-wrapper to give easy > comparison charts from repeatable tests. Did you try that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lartc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
