On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 00:12 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Grant Taylor, > > Am 2011-05-04 14:24:17, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > > On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote: > > >I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to > > >take over this one. > > > > (I'll make this pitch again.) > > > > Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list > > so that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed > > back to the mailing list (as a discussion list)? > > For WHAT? Real MTAs have <L> byside <R> and <G> > > > All in favor? > > Any one against? > > Yes. Sorry guys, but I have to support Michelle here and refrain that anyone not familiar with the "Reply-To" problem in the context of mailinglists do a quick google on "Reply To munging". It's really just some ugly workaround for old/broken MUA to set Reply-To for a mailinglist pointing back to itself. Please don't! -- Best regards, Kilian _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
