> Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list so > that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed back to > the mailing list (as a discussion list)? > > All in favor? > > Any one against? >From RFC2822 (my emphasis): When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the mailbox(es) to which the ***author*** of the message suggests that replies be sent. As a matter of practicality, if you point Reply-To to the list, then you are implementing a policy that all replies, no matter how off-topic, should go to the list. That is probably not what is wanted. Cheers, Ralph. > > > > Grant. . . . > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
