Re: HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh)

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:46:37 +0000
Gustavo Homem <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't use Shorewall, but rather an iptables script which works for
> most scenarios:
No disrespect, but that sounds too scary for me.  I feel more
comfortable if something like Shorewall is holding my hand.
> That is, start with the value the modem is synchronized for, fill the
> line with the average traffic you expect and lower the values until
> is OK. As you lower the upstream value you will find increasingly
> better latency values (try with ping + voip app).
Thanks for the explanation.
> doesn't scale for using across multiple systems of
> different versions.
I didn't understand that bit.  What are the "systems" and "versions"?

Regards

Fog_Watch.

-- 
Lose wait.  Get Gentoo.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux