On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:09:20 +0800, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote > From: "Santiago" <santiago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > The prio qdisc is the solution. Try this. > > > > I wonder if that's speaking from experience or speaking from > theoretical standpoint ? I have always been told, to control > the traffic, I have to be the slowest link in the chain. > > And my question is how slow I should be ! If you are > not the slowest, you can't control. If you are damn slow, > you are under-utilizing your bandwidth. > > Read this section of LARTC :- > > http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.html > > You also have to be sure you are controlling the bottleneck of the > link. If you have a 100Mbit NIC and you have a router that has a > 256kbit link, you have to make sure you are not sending more data > than your router can handle. Otherwise, it will be the router who is > controlling the link and shaping the available bandwith. We need to > 'own the queue' so to speak, and be the slowest link in the chain. > Luckily this is easily possible. > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > > -- > Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner > en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, > y se considera que está limpio. > MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers por su apoyo. -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) -- Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que está limpio. MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers por su apoyo. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
