Thanks Martin. ¿This FLAG is available with 2.6.18 kernel version? I'm using a distro kernel and is as stable that I don't want to upgrade it. Thanks again. Regards El Vie, 24 de Agosto de 2007, 10:51, Martin Milata escribió: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 01:11:35AM +0200, ArcosCom Linux User wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm having a problem with filtering marked packet with tc. >> >> I'm trying to run this: >> >> /sbin/tc filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 8 handle >> 0x7/0x000f fw classid 1:8 >> >> But the response is: >> >> Illegal "handle" >> >> >> Typing the handle without masked mark is working, but I have a >> configuration were I need 2 mark types and I'm using masks: >> Multiple outgoing interfaces (using 0xf000 mask to know the ip route >> filter to allow specific interface for the outcoming traffic). >> QoS (using 0x000f) to know the destination class for the flow. >> >> Perhaps I have an incorrect syntax typing the masked handle, but I don't >> find any information about how to type correctly the masked handle with >> "tc filter" and I'm trying an "ip analogous" syntax. >> >> The ip/tc utils versions I'm using are 2.6.20. >> >> Anybody could help me with this "syntax problem"? >> >> Thanks > > I think the fw classifier does not support masks. However, you can also > use u32 filter to match marks, and it does support matching with mask. > AFAIK, the support for matching marks have to be enabled in the kernel. > > CONFIG_CLS_U32_MARK=y > > And the syntax is like this: > > tc filter add dev imq0 protocol ip prio 8 parent 1:0 u32 match mark \ > 0x7 0x000f flowid 1:8 > > Regards, > -MM > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
