Can you post a "tc -s -d filter ls dev nas0" ?
On 7/2/07, Edouard Thuleau <thuleau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes,
This one was for the DSCP re-marking :
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i nas0 -d 192.168.43.2 -j DSCP --set-dscp 0x08
$TC qdisc add dev nas0 handle ffff: ingress
$TC filter add dev nas0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip tos 0x20 0xff police rate 200kbit burst 1k drop flowid :1
and this one with a DNAT rule :
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i nas0 -p udp --dport 11112 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.10
$TC qdisc add dev nas0 handle ffff: ingress
$TC filter add dev nas0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 192.168.1.10 police rate 200kbit burst 1k drop flowid :12007/7/2, nano bug <linnewbye@xxxxxxxxx >:Hello,
Can you post the scripts you are using ?On 7/2/07, Edouard Thuleau <thuleau@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:Thanks,
I know the older version of this diagram and this one is quite the same I told below but the problem is the same for the DNAT. I made another test. I change the DSCP value in the PREROUTING table and I put an ingress policing which match this new dscp value but the filter doesn't match nothing (I work on a Linux 2.6.17).
With my test, the older version ( http://www.imagestream.com/~josh/PacketFlow.jpg) of the diagram seams more exactly.
Have you an idea ?2007/7/2, nano bug < linnewbye@xxxxxxxxx >:Hello,
I find this one more useful :
http://www.imagestream.com/~josh/PacketFlow-new.pngOn 7/2/07, Edouard Thuleau <thuleau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi,_______________________________________________
I find this diagram which details the kernel packet traveling :
http://www.docum.org/docum.org/kptd/
Is it up to date ?
I made some test and I put a DNAT rules in the PREROUTING table of an interface and I attach it a ingress policy, the dst IP wasn't changed. the DNAT it isn't yet make.
I've another question (I'm not sure is it the good mailing list), for the fragment packet, I see the ingress policy doesn't work correctly and I'd like to know where in the kernel travel of the packet the fragment are re-assemble ? At the NAT or in the routing ?
Thanks,
Edouard.
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc