> -----Original Message----- > From: lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Peter Rabbitson > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:30 PM > Cc: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Re: multiple routing tables for internal router > programs > Well then you are certainly ahead of the game. Still I would suggest to > avoid the complexity of bit mask marks - it is rather error prone and is > pretty hard to maintain, while the same result can usually be achieved > by other means (like in my SNAT example). As far as your original > problem goes - it seems like a mark is getting eaten away or is not set > somewhere in the first place. I have not had any problems like the ones > you describe. Those different MARKs are used for policy-routing, load balancing, firewall, traffic control, virtual server, user-group profiles etc. I think eventually you may have to use it, warts and all, or find some other way for integrating all those. :-) I will soon run out of bits, it seems. I've replaced that multipath rule for local packets with a single route, and change it on failovers. No balancing for local traffic, but there isn't much local traffic anyway. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
