Re: ipip/gre tunnel behind NAT environments.

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you for the reply, Ryan. Yes, unfortunately it does not a linux box, but
D-link IP sharing box. it only shows me IPSEC/PPTP tunnel pass through
options on it. so, it should be passed the ipip or gre packet through
the NAT machine right ?

Thanks in advance.



2007/5/22, Ryan Castellucci <ryan.castellucci@xxxxxxxxx>:
If the firewall is a linux system, you should be able to easily use
DNAT to forward the ipip or gre packets to host 'A'.

Something like...

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i [Firewall's internet facing
interface] -s [Host B's IP] -d [Firewall's public IP] -p ipip -j DNAT
--to-destination [Host A's IP]

I'm not sure if connection tracking will do any of this automatically,
but if it were going to work, A would have to send packets to B over
the tunnel first before B could send to A.

--
Ryan Castellucci http://ryanc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

On 5/19/07, shetravel <shetravel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi, Does anyone tried to get ipip or gre tunnel behind NAT environments. ?
> i'm trying to make both side tunneling with ipip or gre with private address
> just like belows..
>
>
> A -------------------FIRWWAL -------------------INET ------------------- B
>   PRIVATE                PUBLIC
>      PUBLIC
> (10.100.0.1)             (211.xxx.xxx.xxx)
> (211.xxx.xxx.xxx)
>
> is it possible to make both side connections with IPIP or GRE tunnels ?
> thanks in advance.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux