Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > This patch > > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg27506.html > > didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems. As mentioned in the changelog, its in 2.6.19. > The question is - are patches adding some functionality that's not in upstream > kernel accepted? > > There is one wrr patch for iproute floating around that I'm thinking about. Last time I looked at the WRR patch it was a huge mess and used architecture dependant types in the netlink messages. Unless someone fixed this, adding support to iproute is a bad idea since in case it would get merged compatibility would break. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
