On Sunday 11 February 2007 16:48:10 Tomasz Chilinski wrote: > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:19:54 +0100, Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego wrote > > > > > [cut] > > > > > > Have u tried to replace CLASSIFY target by MARK target and then using > > > fw filter? I have got bad experience with CLASSIFY target. > > > > Behaviour is identical if i use classify or mark, however, i > > expected this, because the packets do go to the right classes, it's > > just it looks that ESFQ is not assuring fairness between users > > Which version of ESFQ? Patch for 2.6.15.1 or 2.6.19.2? > > Bests, Tomasz Chilinski. > Actually for 2.6.29.2 And i made some progress, using a depth parameter higher than default (800) it behaves better and closer to fairness.... ¿Can some explain the exact meaning of limit and depth options? Thank you
Attachment:
pgpjjVLETNUo1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
