Re: Interesting article about punching holes in firewalls...

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Grant Taylor schrieb:
I personally have known that using "-m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED" was not the most secure thing to use for returning traffic.
Actually, what the described method accomplishes is not defeating the "firewall" part, but the "NAT" part. If one of the hosts was not behind a NAT, the traffic would flow even with ESTABLISHED,RELATED, because it belongs to active "connection".

Namely this will allow you to make a valid connection to a web server, say to retrieve a picture. Then said web server could send malicious traffic back to your computer and pass through your firewall.
Please note it does not allow you to create a new connection, just use POTENTIAL connections that wouldn't work due to NAT.

Grant. . . .
Yours sincerely,
Peter

--
http://www.shurdix.org - Linux distribution for routers and firewalls
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux