Re: Intel or AMD is better processor for router (800+ users)

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marek Kierdelewicz wrote:
I think you could do well with P4 3GHz HT. It would be cheapest and
most effective choice. With HT enabled kernel two nic-s could be
configured that each nic's interrupt is serviced by another
processor.
I recommend reading this article:
http://lwn.net/Articles/145406/

P4 will suffice as long as you will keep your config optimised (hashing
tc filters, using ipset instead of long sequences of iptables
rules ...).

Hi,

The referenced article mentions this in the chapter "4.2.3.1 CPUs should only following one NIC".

The author highly recommends disabling IRQ balancing in the kernel config, but does not clarify what this does. I tried googling but didn't find much info. What does it exactly do, and why is disabling it recommended/required?

It seems to me, IRQ balancing does not allow to specify interrupts per device but assigns them automatically on the run, correct?

While searching the web, I found reports about big performance increases in 3D rendering due to disabling the feature. Can this be true and why?

Thanks,
	Alex
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux