On Wednesday 16 August 2006 13:03, Luciano Ruete wrote: > On Wednesday 16 August 2006 10:11, Jacques Rompen wrote: > > On 8/14/06, Luciano Ruete <luciano@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Monday 14 August 2006 12:42, Jacques Rompen wrote: > > > > Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive > > > > searched all over the internet for a solution for > > > > my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet > > > > more problems. > > > > > > > > What we want to do is the following: > > > > I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its > > > > own internet connection from the same ISP. > > > > Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on mac-adres basis. > > > > Every internet connection is capped at 20mbit > > > > up/down. > > > > We want to get all computers on an internal network. So we need some > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > of router that accepts all 8 internet > > > > connections and routes it out over a gbit nic -> switch -> internal > > > > > > network > > > > > > > So we have a computer with 10 nics and "hopefully" enough internal > > > > bandwith. > > > > > > one simple solution is in this post[1] (read all the thread if you > > > whant a context). Bassically it uses iptables CONNMARK to remembre to > > > which iface(and > > > certanly wich src ip) each connection flow belongs. > > > > > > You will have to use same gw in all ifaces, maybe the ip route "onlink" > > > ption(command line) make your script simpler. No need to use julian > > > patch and > > > certanly DO NOT USE CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED in your kernel > > > config. > > > > > > Feel free to post any doubts. > > > > > > Greets. > > > > > > [1]http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2006q2/018964.html > > > -- > > > -- > > > Luciano > > > > Hi Luciano, > > > > Ive tried the above solution but then with juliano's patch instead of > > conmark. It didnt work then because this part of the script: > > > > ip ro add default nexthop via x.x.x.x dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via > > y.y.y.y dev eth2 > > ip route add default table provider1 via x.x.x.x dev eth1 > > ip route add default table provider2 via y.y.y.y dev eth2 > > # and most important > > ip rule add fwmark 0x1 table provider1 > > ip rule add fwmark 0x2 table provider2 > > > > somehow looked at the default gateway x.x.x.x or y.y.y.y instead of to > > the "dev ethx" > > Because the gateway adresses were both the same x.x.x.x = y.y.y.y all the > > outgoing packets were routed out over eth1. > > ok, what if you try with onlink: > ip ro add default nexthop via x.x.x.x eth1 onlink nexthop via x.x.x.x eth2 > onlink and so on... and forget to say, to be really shure, del any trace of x.x.x.x dev ethx scope link in "ip ro ls". Where x.x.x.x is the gw ip, the onlink will force to drop the packet on the named device even if there is no physical route to that host. -- Luciano _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
