On 27-07-2006 19:45, Marlon Dutra wrote:
Hello,
...
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016981.html In that post, there is another guy with the same problem, but with 2.6.11.
I can't see any problem there! If this guy expected lower rate for 1:39 class, he should have lower the ceil. This class had much higher traffic then the other class and probably was borrowing just when this stats were prepared.
Jarek P. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
