Luciano Ruete wrote: > On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:01, Andrew Lyon wrote: >>> That's probably an equalize bug, that does not take in account >>> 'weight' for packet balance. Equalize is unmaintained software >>> AFAIK. >> >> Perhaps not so much a bug as a lack of functionality.. >> >> Back to my original question then, is there anything in 2.6 or a >> patch for >> 2.4 that could be used to do that? (4:3 ratio split of outgoing >> packets over two interfaces/gateways). > > Why you need the balance in a packet basis? > > If you use a vanilla kernel and simple multipath, then the radio 4:3 > should work ok. Simple.. we use apps that need more bandwidth than a single line can provide. Andy /*JOSEDV001TAG/* _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
