i'm following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is very detailed, but i'm a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of leaf classes.
In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at message) in this way:
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo lmit 10
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:22 handle 220: pfifo lmit 10
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:23 handle 230: pfifo lmit 10
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:24 handle 240: pfifo lmit 10
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:31 handle 310: pfifo lmit 10
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:32 handle 320: pfifo lmit 10
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:33 handle 330: pfifo lmit 10
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:34 handle 340: pfifo lmit 10
But is not better use SFQ, like this?
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: sfq preturb 10
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:22 handle 220: sfq preturb 10
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:23 handle 230: sfq preturb 10
.
.
.
What's the real difference?
Best Regards
--
Stefano Mainardi
Presidente Associazione ILDN - Italian Linux Distro Network
Mobile: 349/3917212
Skype: mainardistefano
IM (ICQ): 250-292-408
Blog: http://www.mainardistefano.org
Attachment:
ds-lb-284.gif
Description: GIF image
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
