Re: HTB at 100+ Mbits/sec

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'll try using 450 K and setting a higher ceil to see how it works.
Also I was wondering what limits (if any) the kernel timer resolution
imposes on HTB.

Thanks!
Muthu

On 5/11/06, Jody Shumaker <jody.shumaker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/10/06, Muthukumar S <muthukumar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> First up, thanks for the response Jody. I appreciate your taking the
> time to answer.
>
> So in essence what this means is that I will not be able to use the
> maximum that the link allows if I'm shaping traffic? Please correct me
> if I got this wrong - let's say my ISP claims 512 Kbit/s upload and
> real throughput varies between 450 Kbit/s and 500 Kbit/s. So if I
> shaped traffic using 450 Kbit/s as the root qdisc, I would lose out on
> the occasions when the line does allow more than 450 Kbit/s?
>

Unfortunately yes,  if you want the shaping to work well you need to
set it appropiately. No real way to have it vary dynamically.
Basically what happens when you're not the bottleneck is that ping
times will go up as data will queue at the other bottleneck, and your
bandwidth allotments will no longer accurately represent the
connection.  They'll have less of an effect as TCP throttling starts
having to kick in.

I imagine if you designed the rules you could have the ratio between
your classes still honored, and only have the increased lag or
possibility for packet loss.  To do this if you knew it was always
atleast 450k but sometimes 500k, set the rates for all the child
classes to add up to 450k,  but use 500k as the highest ceiling and
for the base class. Then in this case it should still continue to
split the 450k evenly between the classes as you described, but still
using up to the 500k when its available. Not sure how well this would
work though as I've usually been more concerned with keeping the
latency down, and set the ceil such that the majority of the time its
slightly below the real bandwidth.

- Jody

P.S. Thanks for forwarding the email to the list, I alway forget to
hit reply to all.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux