On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:33 -0400, Kurt Guenther wrote: > It looks like the reply to isn't set up on the list server? No it's changed. In a nut shell. Hitting reply sends reply to sender of email. Defaults to private. Just about every mailer has a Reply To All, which does just that. So in the case of mailing lists. It seems many are migrating in that direction. Which technically is the proper way to go. >From a habit and laziness standpoint it's a total pain. From a technical and logical point of view. It makes total sense. This came up not to long ago on the LARTC list. I was for it being the old way. Till a user provided the following. After reading all (long reads but necessarily) I reversed my stance and had to agree with list admins decision. First read: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Then, the rebuttal: http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html Finally, the rebuttal to the rebuttal: http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.txt -- Sincerely, William L. Thomson Jr. Obsidian-Studios, Inc. http://www.obsidian-studios.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
