First of all: Thanks for the answer!!!!
Ard van Breemen schrieb:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Sven Anders wrote:
> <snipped a lot>
>>> ip route add 10.100.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link
>> RTNETLINK answers: File exists
>
> s/add/append/
>
>> I thought they are different!?!
>> Is here any difference I did not see?
>> If they are not different, why does the kernel not recognize it
>> (see above) and avoid the duplicate entry?
>
> add prevents duplicates, append just adds.
Ok, this would prevent the error, but it does not explain the error itself. Did
you tried it yourself? All I want to know is, if I did a mistake. If so, please
explain my error...
>> Another question:
>>
>> Why can't I set a route on an interface that is down?
>
> That's by some design. Use patches from linuxvirtualserver.org if
> you want them to exist.
Ok, I will try it... But what's the reason for this design?
I think, this test could be done in user-space and did not have to be in the
kernel.
>
>> PPS: Why is ANYBODY still ignoring this e-mail for over 3 weeks?????
>
> People are busy :-)
Ok, I understand this, but for over three weeks with so many people on this
mailing list?? :-)
Regards
Sven
--
Sven Anders <anders@xxxxxxxxxx> () Ascii Ribbon Campaign
/\ Support plain text e-mail
ANDURAS service solutions AG
Innstra?e 71 - 94036 Passau - Germany
Web: www.anduras.de - Tel: +49 (0)851-4 90 50-0 - Fax: +49 (0)851-4 90 50-55
begin:vcard
fn:Sven Anders
n:Anders;Sven
org:ANDURAS AG;Research and Development
adr;quoted-printable:;;Innstra=C3=9Fe 71;Passau;Bavaria;94036;Germany
email;internet:anders@xxxxxxxxxx
title:Dipl. Inf.
tel;work:++49 (0)851 / 490 50 - 0
tel;fax:+49 (0)851 / 4 90 50 - 55
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.anduras.de
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
