On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:12 +0200, sAwAr wrote: > hi for those who was fallowing this topic I can say that > > IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED must be disabled! After few tests I'm quite > sure that this was cousing my problems. Now I'm using 2.5.15 kernel > without patch of Julian Anastasov and load-balancing is working. FYI those patches do allot of things. Like static routes, unplug an interface or shut it down and watch all your routes and tables go away. Much less all the stuff the alt routes patch addresses. As for no nat? Interesting. > lartc split-access how to and http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt now both > are working fine Yeah over all you are cool if the rules are correct, but if you have a line go down or etc. You will want the prohibit line so a icmp message is sent. > Now I will try to use fwmark based routing and propably I will write > with next problem soon :P Cool, that's one I have not done myself. Not found a need so far, been able to do all I have need via other means. -- Sincerely, William L. Thomson Jr. Obsidian-Studios, Inc. http://www.obsidian-studios.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
