Re: [PATCH] TC: bug fixes to the "sample" clause

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 09:34 -0500, jamal wrote:
> If you are unable to do this then I will. I just dont have time until this
> Sunday.
> I will not respond to any further emails which do not contain data - instead
> I am going to produce mine.

After that wrist-slap I spent some time putting together 
some data.  I am still not really sure what you are after,
so if this isn't it please let me know:

http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/hash-analysis/

One other thing: I have made a rather embarrassing error
earlier.  When I computed my metric's I posted earlier 
about 2.4 and 2.6, I emulated the 2.6 hash incorrectly.
If it has of been correct, rather than showing a landside
win for 2.4, it would of shown that 2.6 was slightly 
better.


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux