Jakub Wartak wrote: >You should use PRIO to divide traffic into 2 classes >1) ultra-critical ( here : cs game ) >2) other >3) very low prio > >( more info is on www.voip-info.org , section : QoS under Linux ) >you just have to mark CS packets and put them into the right PRIO class > > > Class 1:1 has prio 0 in htb and filters. other classes have a higher priority. I've made a test. I've added 1: ---- 1:1 --- 10: htb class sfq and bloked all other ports and traffic. With this setup I was unable to lower the ping to be less than 280. This made me come to the conclusion that ANY_ classification would introduce a packet delay. So if I use prio qdisc wouldn't that be a classification? This is why I created the CS class as a root class. To answer to the other mail: CS maximum bandwidth consumption is about 500k. That is why the sum never exeeds the netrate. People in my LAN play almost exclusively in MAN, not in the Internet. I allocated such high bandwidth because htb would allocate the spare based on classes' rates ratios. And since 1:1 is a root class as 1:2 and 1:3 (MAN and Internet respectively) it had to have such a rate even if it is not found in my real bandwidth. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
