On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:08:27PM -0300, Luciano Ruete wrote: > root->parent_all_host(256,256)->client_host_1(X,X)->host_1_prio(X*0.9,X) > ->host_1_dfl(X*0.1,X) What's the purpose of the 256kbit class? In the setup you posted, the 200/230kbit child class does not seem to have any siblings. Except for the root class, classes without siblings don't make sense. At least, I haven't seen any useful purpose for them so far. > I've attached simplified ad-hoc scripts that reproduce the scenarios: > tc_at_200 (full tc/iptables commands to recreate the X<200 scenario) > tc_at_230 (full tc/iptables commands to recreate the X>200 scenario) I haven't tested them, but they seem to be all right (except for the question above). I don't know if it will help at all, but could you post tc statistics for both 200 and 230 cases? You can get the statistics using 'tc -s -d qdisc/class show dev $iface' or similar command. Also, did you check wether HTB is complaining about anything in dmesg when setting up the 230 class tree? Which kernel version and iproute/tc version are you running? Just in case you're still suffering from old HTB bugs... Regards Andreas Klauer _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
