Manish Kathuria wrote:
Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
Manish Kathuria wrote:
>>Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have gone through http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt AND further
>> http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ & got confused in choosing the right patch.
>> Please suggest if I will choose Jumbo Patch patch-2.4.20-ja1.diff ,
is
>> any other patches also required after this? If yes, is there
>> any sequence in applying these patches?
>>
>
>For your purpose, you need to choose one of the patches at
>http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes depending on your kernel. You dont need
>the Jumbo patch for load balancing and failover. The "routes" patch
>should suffice.
>
>--
>Manish Kathuria
>http://www.tuxspace.com/
Thanks Manish.
I have download routes-2.4.20-9.diff as I have RHEL3.0 (Kernel
2.4.21-9EL) & apply the same.
But the output as follows. Is this normal or any problem?
# patch -p1 < routes-2.4.20-9.diff
Hunk #1 FAILED at 162.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 180 with fuzz 1 (offset 5 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
linux/include/net/ip_fib.h.rej
patching file linux/include/net/route.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 49.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 120 with fuzz 2 (offset -8 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 140.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
linux/include/net/route.h.rej
patching file linux/net/ipv4/arp.c
patching file linux/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
Hunk #3 succeeded at 212 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 222.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 244.
The Red Hat kernels are not just plain vanilla kernels. They already
have a number of patches applied by Red Hat and it is likely that the
patch being applied by you is conflicting by one of those. You can
either try some other kernel version or download a plain vanilla kernel
from http://www.kernel.org/ and apply the routes patch on it.
--
Manish
http://www.tuxspace.com/
Dear Mr. Manish,
Now the multipath is working. Thank you for the support.
I am also facing the nexthop down problem & working on the suggestion, which
are already on the mailing list.
List members suggestion are required on following more quarries:
1. Most of my lan users usages Remote Desktop Connection to one of our
server hosted outside India.
Whenever ISP1 link goes down (I have down it manually), their
connection get lost.
After approx 10 min, they are able to connect it again. Any pointer
where I am wrong?
2. Out of 3 task (Load Balance, ISP Failover, Club Both ISP Bandwidth) Two
task are complete. How can
Club Bandwidth be implement on this box?
3. One Public IP device (VOIP) installed inside the LAN. I want to allow all
traffic IN & OUT to this device.
How to do this in this configuration? Currently there is no DMZ
configuration in firewall.
Thank you,
Sandeep Agarwal
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
