Re: u32 match versus iptables CLASSIFY target - performance

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:15:02PM +0200, Cristian Carstea wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> i have a question:
>> - which one is faster: "tc filter with u32 match per dst ip" or
"iptables match per dst ip with target CLASSIFY"?
>> - this question is for large rulesets (over 500)
>
> use hashes if it's possible to hash those "ip dst".

can you please detail this a little?

thank you,
cristian carstea


>
>>
>> thank you,
>> cristian carstea
>
> --
>   _,-=._              /|_/|
>   `-.}   `=._,.-=-._.,  @ @._,
>      `._ _,-.   )      _,.-'
>         `    G.m-"^m`m'        Dmytro O. Redchuk
>




_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux